| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

The Jacob Street Mystery

Page history last edited by Jon 15 years, 2 months ago

Freeman, R Austin - The Jacob Street Mystery (1942) aka The Unconscious Witness

 

Freeman's final novel is known variously as The Jacob Street Mystery or The Unconscious Witness (1942). It shows the two part construction of many of Freeman's later books. The Thorndyke section has a courtroom finale, during which Thorndyke reveals the truth, in a manner we now associate with Erle Stanley Gardner's Perry Mason. Courtroom scenes had played a major role in Freeman, right from the first Thorndyke novel, The Red Thumb Mark (1907). The Thorndyke sections also bring back his leg man private eye, Mr. Snuper, who had previously appeared in Felo De Se?. Freeman loved such Dickens like names for his characters. Today we tend to think of private eyes as American. But British novels of the realist school, such as Freeman Wills Crofts, also frequently included them. Fictional British private eyes tend to be seedy, sneaky, small business men with tiny offices and lower middle class backgrounds.

 

The early chapters of the book show Freeman's portrait of a painter, his simple pleasant life, and his devotion to his art. These sections have a strong autobiographical feel, as if Freeman were offering an allegorical justification of his own life long devotion to the artist's life. The painter is also a skilled craftsman, as are most of Freeman's heroes, and we get a well done look at the craft side of a painter's life, from preparing a canvas to making a full painting. Freeman was himself a landscape painter, like the hero of this novel, so he is writing about events he understands from the inside.

 

After this, Freeman gradually gets a mystery going. The tone of the novel darkens, and it eventually turns into a grim tale. Freeman breaks new ground here by introducing a sympathetic and non stereotyped African character, a lawyer from Ghana visiting England. The end of the mystery contains some of Freeman's most surrealistic plotting ever. Analysts could have a field day with Freeman's material. Freudians could regard the book as a revelation of Freeman's own subconscious desires, whereas sociological critics could see the book as an allegory about the relationship between Britain and its colonies in West Africa. This book is far from perfect; there are many coincidences throughout the work, actions are sometimes far fetched and unmotivated, and much of the material is too grim for comfort. But the book is faithful to the mystery tradition in that it chooses to sneak up out of left field on the reader in the most unexpected ways possible. Freeman has chosen to end his career with a real mystery story, one that shows the power of the genre to explore the genuine mysteries of our lives.

 

Mike Grost


Tom Pedley is a painter of landscapes. However, on this particular day in May the work on which he is engaged needs more than a little imagination, for he is in a small copse in Gravel Pit Wood, whose bosky dells are being rapidly gobbled up by developers. Concealed by shrubbery from the casual glance, he observes a woman creeping along the path through the wood. Her odd behaviour shows she is eavesdropping on a pair of men who have just walked past. One man returns and is furtively followed by the woman, and the intrigued Pedley checks the far end of the path but sees no sign of the second man.

 

Pedley lives in a studio in Jacob Street, which has a number of houses favoured by artistic types, and while eating his tea that afternoon decides to create a work based on the strange incident. He will call it The Eavesdropper and use his keen artistic eye to recreate the three strangers as actors in the scene. About a week later, he is working on the painting when his friend Mr Polton -- they first met in a Soho antique shop -- calls with a gift, a pewter tankard purchased in a shocking state from a Shoreditch junk stall and refurbished by the handy Mr P. Nor is this the only skill Mr Polton displays in the course of the mystery. Indeed, if he had ever turned to a life of crime he would have been difficult to catch.

 

It is from Mr Polton that the artist, who has no wireless and does not read the papers, learns a murder by forcible administration of poison was committed in the wood during the very time he was painting the sylvan scene, and that from a description circulated in print and on the airwaves he is obviously the man being sought for interview by the police.

 

Enter Inspector Blandy, not to mention the brassy Mrs Schiller, a modernist artist separated from her husband and now living next door to Pedley, and Mr William Vanderpuye. He is studying with Dr Thorndyke and thus known to Mr Polton, who introduces him to the artist. It is while visiting the studio to arrange for a portrait sitting that Mr Vanderpuye meets Mrs Schiller, who pops in for a visit most days. The pair strike up a close friendship and Mr Vanderpuye is the last person seen with her before her disppearance. For while a dead woman is found locked into Mrs Schiller's room, she is not its tenant.

 

We now leap forward a couple of years. Mrs Schiller is still missing, but Drs Thorndyke and Jervis become involved in the case due to a large bequest which would be hers if she is still alive. A presumption of death has been requested but the solicitor feels uneasy about the circumstances. Is she alive, and if she is, why has she not been found despite sterling efforts by the authorities and a vast amount of publicity in the press? Who is the woman found dead in her room and what is the connection between them?

 

My verdict: Readers of this book learn another way to open a door locked from the inside. Doubtless most if not all listees are familiar with at least two of them, the turn-key-from-the-outside-with-the-sugar-tongs and the push-key-out-on-to-a-piece-of-paper-shoved-under-the-door-and-pull-carefully -to-your-side. The latter works as I discovered when locked in my bedroom in a 1930s vintage flat as a witty jape, but you need a door with a gap under it. The method used in this case needs a particular type of key, common at the time so fair enough, and its use helps point up the fact that, despite appearances, the dead woman found in Mrs Schiller's room was not a suicide. There are sufficient and fair clues, and the investigations are described in lively fashion. It turns out to be a more complicated case than it seems at first glance. I guessed part of the solution but not the whole, and all in all found this novel one of the better Thorndyke outings.

 

Mary Reed

 

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.